- Advertisement -Newspaper WordPress Theme
World NewsEnel CEO skeptical of carbon capture and storage technology

Enel CEO skeptical of carbon capture and storage technology

The CEO of multinational Italian vitality agency Enel has expressed doubt on the usefulness of carbon capture and storage, suggesting the technology just isn’t a local weather answer.

“We have tried and tried — and when I say ‘we’, I mean the electricity industry,” Francesco Starace advised CNBC’s Karen Tso on Wednesday.

“You can imagine, we tried hard in the past 10 years — maybe more, 15 years — because if we had a reliable and economically interesting solution, why would we go and shut down all these coal plants [when] we could decarbonize the system?”

The European Commission, the EU’s govt arm, has described carbon capture and storage as a set of applied sciences targeted on “capturing, transporting, and storing CO2 emitted from power plants and industrial facilities.”

The concept is to cease CO2 “reaching the atmosphere, by storing it in suitable underground geological formations.”

The Commission has mentioned the utilization of carbon capture and storage is “important” in relation to serving to decrease greenhouse fuel emissions. This view is predicated on the rivalry {that a} substantial proportion of each trade and energy era will nonetheless be reliant on fossil fuels within the years forward.

Read extra about clear vitality from CNBC Pro

Enel’s Starace, nonetheless, appeared skeptical about carbon capture’s potential.

“The fact is, it doesn’t work, it hasn’t worked for us so far,” he mentioned. “And there is a rule of thumb here: If a technology doesn’t really pick up in five years — and here we’re talking about more than five, we’re talking about 15, at least — you better drop it.”

There are different local weather options, Starace mentioned. “Basically, stop emitting carbon,” he mentioned.

“I’m not saying it’s not worth trying again but we’re not going to do it. Maybe other industries can try harder and succeed. For us, it is not a solution.”

Carbon capture technology is commonly held up as a supply of hope in decreasing international greenhouse fuel emissions, that includes prominently in nations’ local weather plans in addition to the net-zero methods of some of the world’s largest oil and fuel firms.

Proponents of these applied sciences imagine they will play an necessary and numerous function in assembly international vitality and local weather objectives.

Climate researchers, campaigners and environmental advocacy teams, nonetheless, have lengthy argued that carbon capture and storage applied sciences delay the world’s fossil gasoline dependency and distract from a much-needed pivot to renewable options.

Plans to extend shareholder dividends

Starace was talking after Enel printed a strategic plan for 2022-24 and laid out its goals for the years forward. Among different issues, Enel will make direct investments of 170 billion euros ($190.7 billion) by 2030.

Direct investments in renewable vitality property that Enel will personal are set to hit 70 billion euros. Consolidated put in renewable capability, or capability that’s instantly owned by Enel, is anticipated to succeed in 129 gigawatts by 2030.

In addition, Enel, which is headquartered in Rome, mentioned it had introduced ahead its net-zero dedication — a objective which pertains to each direct and oblique emissions — to 2040, having beforehand been 2050.

On the fossil gasoline entrance, the group needs to exit coal era by the yr 2027, with its exit from fuel era happening by 2040.

Enel additionally mentioned that, between 2021 and 2024, shareholders have been “expected to receive a fixed Dividend Per Share … that is planned to increase by 13%, up to 0.43 euros/share.”

During his interview with CNBC, Starace was requested about Enel’s increased dividend forecast and the broader debate about how one might be invested in so-called “sin stocks” — on this occasion, huge polluters inside the vitality house — and nonetheless get good returns, significantly on the dividend facet of issues.

“It’s all about risk rewards,” he mentioned. “And at the end of the day, I don’t see anything wrong with an increasingly risky business [being] … forced to increase dividends if you want to attract investors.”

“What we’re trying to say is there is a breaking point, there is a point in which the risk becomes unbearable no matter what dividends you want to distribute, and that is approaching,” he mentioned.

“So in our case, what you need to do is get out of this risk, get out of the carbon footprint and also make sure that when you put the word ‘net’ in front of zero, this ‘net’ doesn’t become some kind of a trick around which you don’t decarbonize, really, your operations.”

“We’re saying we’re going to be zero carbon, which means we’re not going to emit carbon and we will, therefore [not] … need to plant trees to offset that carbon.”

Starace acknowledged, nonetheless, that timber can be required over the following centuries to take away carbon left within the environment attributable to historic emissions.

—CNBC’s Sam Meredith contributed to this text.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Exclusive content

- Advertisement -Newspaper WordPress Theme

Latest article

More article

- Advertisement -Newspaper WordPress Theme