- Advertisement -Newspaper WordPress Theme
InvestmentsJudge temporarily blocks New York Times from publishing Project Veritas materials By...

Judge temporarily blocks New York Times from publishing Project Veritas materials By Reuters


© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The New York Times constructing is seen in Manhattan, New York, U.S., August 3, 2020. REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton/File Photo


By Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK (Reuters) -A New York trial choose on Thursday temporarily blocked the New York Times from publishing some materials in regards to the conservative activist group Project Veritas, a uncommon step that the newspaper stated violated many years of First Amendment protections for the method.

The order by Justice Charles Wood of the Westchester County Supreme Court covers memos written by a Project Veritas lawyer and obtained by the Times.

Wood scheduled a listening to for subsequent Tuesday to contemplate an extended prohibition in opposition to publication, and whether or not the Times ought to take away references to privileged attorney-client info in a Nov. 11 https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/11/us/politics/project-veritas-journalism-political-spying.html article about Project Veritas’ journalism practices.

“This ruling is unconstitutional and sets a dangerous precedent,” Dean Baquet, the Times’ government editor, stated in an emailed assertion.

“When a court silences journalism, it fails its citizens and undermines their right to know,” he added. “The Supreme Court made that clear in the Pentagon Papers case, a landmark ruling against prior restraint blocking the publication of newsworthy journalism. That principle clearly applies here. We are seeking an immediate review of this decision.”

Baquet’s assertion referred to the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1971 rejection of the Nixon administration’s bid to cease the Times and the Washington Post from publishing the Pentagon Papers, which detailed U.S. army involvement in Vietnam.

Bruce Brown, government director of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, referred to as prior restraint “among the most serious threats to press freedom,” and stated an appeals court docket ought to vacate Wood’s order if the choose doesn’t.

“This is the first prior restraint entered against the New York Times since the Pentagon Papers, and it is an outrageous affront to the First Amendment,” Brown stated in a press release.

Project Veritas has additionally been concerned in a U.S. Department of Justice probe into its attainable function within the reported theft https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/05/us/politics/project-veritas-investigation-ashley-biden-diary.html of a diary from President Joe Biden’s daughter Ashley.

It stated in court docket filings that the FBI this month seized cellphones, pursuant to go looking warrants, from the houses of founder James O’Keefe and two of the group’s former members.

O’Keefe advised in a press release after Wood issued his order that the Times utilized completely different journalistic requirements in protecting these searches.

“The paper needs to decide if it is in favor of press freedom for all, or only itself, because it can’t have it both ways,” he stated.

Lawyers for Project Veritas had urged Wood to intervene after “references to, descriptions of, and verbatim quotations” from memos by its lawyer Benjamin Barr appeared within the Times.

The group can be suing the Times for defamation over a September 2020 article https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/29/us/politics/project-veritas-ilhan-omar.html describing a video it launched alleging voter fraud in Minnesota.

In a court docket submitting, Project Veritas referred to as the Nov. 11 article “a bare and vindictive attempt to harm and embarrass a litigation adversary.”

Times legal professionals advised Wood he shouldn’t impose a “draconian and disfavored restriction” in opposition to publication, with out giving the newspaper an opportunity to indicate that Project Veritas’ request was “factually and legally deficient.”

The case is Project Veritas v New York Times Co et al, New York State Supreme Court, Westchester County, No. 63921/2020.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Exclusive content

- Advertisement -Newspaper WordPress Theme

Latest article

More article

- Advertisement -Newspaper WordPress Theme